= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Douglas_Knight comments on What attracts smart and curious young people to physics? Should this be encouraged? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (35)
Not much of an undergraduate physics degree is honest experimental testing for fundamental models against reality. Possibly the answer is none except at good schools, but even at good schools the amount in other fields is zero. But a large part of the physics curriculum is about understanding the limits of approximations, testing them against mathematical models that are assumed to be true.
I would say "Except for Computer Science", where testing theories is practically half your job. There are probably other exceptions, but that's the one I'm familiar with.
CS teaches a very different skill and it teaches it very badly.
I think bioinformatics provides a better introduction to science. We did experiments that produces results that didn't match the book results and saw how hard it is to get experiments to reproduce.
We also had more statistics classes the the average physics course.