You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Why are Harvard's alumni so wealthy? - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: JonahSinick 15 March 2014 06:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 March 2014 05:12:13PM 1 point [-]

If this is true, > 750 of the 3000 Harvard graduates who made $30m+ actually made $100m+.

Not made, but have. I would hazard a guess that much of that money is inherited and not "made" by the current generation. This, by the way, also has implications for wealth distribution by age (because the inherited wealth becomes yours only after your parents die).

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 16 March 2014 11:45:31PM 1 point [-]

The original source says that the Harvard rich are 74% self-made, 14% inherited, and 12% some mixture.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 March 2014 11:50:28PM 1 point [-]

I would like to see how they define their labels and how do they arrive at their numbers before I would be willing to believe them.

Comment author: ESRogs 17 March 2014 07:13:03AM 0 points [-]

Why so skeptical?

Comment author: Lumifer 17 March 2014 03:43:47PM 1 point [-]

There are strong methodological problems with making such estimates. The easiest way to go about it -- send out questionnaires and tally up those returned -- does not produce good numbers. Besides, wealthx is a business. I am not sure what their incentives are but I am sure they have some.

Comment author: ESRogs 17 March 2014 06:20:23PM 0 points [-]

Ah, gotcha, thanks!