You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

8YfSLVVpnYLstBFVtC9q comments on Open thread, 18-24 March 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: David_Gerard 18 March 2014 12:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (171)

Comments (171)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 04:58:21PM *  0 points [-]

.

Comment author: shminux 19 March 2014 05:05:42PM -1 points [-]

I find it counterproductive to assign probability or truth value to untestables.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 05:16:48PM *  0 points [-]

.

Comment author: shminux 19 March 2014 06:22:34PM -1 points [-]

If your decisions depend on untestables, you need a better decision theory.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 06:43:59PM *  0 points [-]

.

Comment author: Lumifer 19 March 2014 06:49:49PM 0 points [-]

it has some consequences on my personal experience of the world that I will probably see in some time, given that it's actually true.

What might these consequences be?

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 06:55:22PM *  0 points [-]

.

Comment author: Lumifer 19 March 2014 07:12:33PM 1 point [-]

I don't think that's how MWI works.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 07:16:02PM *  0 points [-]

.

Comment author: Lumifer 19 March 2014 07:27:39PM 1 point [-]

So I can kill myself without worrying about some nasty existential horror shit, if needs be? Because that's really all I wanted to know and LW seems like the only place that would take a query like this seriously

Does not follow. MWI is orthogonal to "some nasty existential horror shit", it doesn't provide evidence either for or against your worries.

Comment author: shminux 19 March 2014 06:54:19PM *  -1 points [-]

Quantum immortality is based on MWI, which is designed explicitly to match the standard "shut up and calculate" approach to QM, which means that it cannot have any measurable effects outside the standard framework, where "Everett branches" are known as "possible outcomes". If you expect different consequences for your personal experience in the two pictures, you probably do not understand MWI.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 06:59:49PM *  0 points [-]

.

Comment author: shminux 19 March 2014 08:09:36PM -1 points [-]

Blanking your comments before retracting them? To hide changing your mind after learning stuff?

Comment author: [deleted] 19 March 2014 08:17:39PM *  0 points [-]

No, now that I got a clear picture of this issue I will delete this account among other things. Sorry for bothering you.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit