shminux comments on Open thread, 18-24 March 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (171)
If your decisions depend on untestables, you need a better decision theory.
.
What might these consequences be?
.
I don't think that's how MWI works.
.
Does not follow. MWI is orthogonal to "some nasty existential horror shit", it doesn't provide evidence either for or against your worries.
.
I have no idea what do you worry about, but according to our current understanding in this life there is no detectable difference between a Copenhagen world and an Everett world. As to the afterlife, all bets are off -- contemporary physics can't help you there.
.
Quantum immortality is based on MWI, which is designed explicitly to match the standard "shut up and calculate" approach to QM, which means that it cannot have any measurable effects outside the standard framework, where "Everett branches" are known as "possible outcomes". If you expect different consequences for your personal experience in the two pictures, you probably do not understand MWI.
.
Blanking your comments before retracting them? To hide changing your mind after learning stuff?
No, now that I got a clear picture of this issue I will delete this account among other things. Sorry for bothering you.