You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

John_Maxwell_IV comments on How valuable is volunteering? - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: JonahSinick 29 March 2014 09:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 30 March 2014 10:21:26PM 0 points [-]

Makes sense. But from a utility maximization standpoint, if I have some cool idea like pseudo selectors that I want to introduce to more people, I'd argue that I'd often be better off trying to improve the best-in-class tool (even if it's initially just a fork/branch/etc.) than creating another competing tool.

Comment author: fezziwig 30 March 2014 11:21:29PM 1 point [-]

In a sense, they did: everybody wrote Javascript frameworks, instead of writing new languages which compiled to Javascript.

But all kidding aside, it's hard to predict in advance which cool-sounding ideas are actually cool, and it's very hard to maintain a best-in-class tool if you're willing to merge concepts that haven't been battle-tested elsewhere. This is another reason jQuery won: its plugin system gave it a way to cultivate ideas that could be awesome but that weren't yet ready for the big show.