You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on How valuable is volunteering? - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: JonahSinick 29 March 2014 09:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 02 April 2014 04:38:05PM 1 point [-]

the wage for a job is very close to the opportunity cost, i.e., there is little surplus to workers

I think there is some confusion here between opportunity cost of time and costs of producing value. They are not the same thing.

Consider someone whose skills are in demand, for example a statistician with skills and experience to deal with the Big Data. He can pick from a number of jobs and the top tier of jobs available to him all pay around $200K/year. He selects one of these jobs and is paid $200K/year.

What's his opportunity cost of time? $200K/year. What's his wage? $200K/year. You are saying that he does not get any economic surplus and this does not seem to be true at all.

Yes, I think there is a strong prior against interfering with the market mechanism.

While I am sympathetic to this view, it strikes me that it is not very compatible with supporting charities (including EA) or, say, government social safety net programs.

Comment author: VipulNaik 02 April 2014 10:42:02PM 0 points [-]

I deliberately chose a simple example to keep it simple. The full macroeconomic analysis is trickier. I can write a more detailed explanation that does an analysis with more people (each replacing another). I'll do so later when I have the time.