You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on The Cold War divided Science - Less Wrong Discussion

21 Post author: Douglas_Knight 05 April 2014 11:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (53)
Tags: institutions disagreement academia science

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 18 August 2014 02:58:07PM 0 points [-]

I meant for each individual type. I don't know if there's any particular reason to believe all three kinds of fuels were from the same process.

I suppose the fact that they all have comparable amounts of fuel is some evidence, but it's not as strong, since I don't think we would particularly expect comparable amounts of fuel even if they did have the same source.

Comment author: DanArmak 18 August 2014 03:16:15PM 0 points [-]

Then I agree, as I said,

Maybe even some types could be produced from both origins, although the prior is low and it's true in this case you would expect a majority to come from one process.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit