You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam_Bur comments on Controversy - Healthy or Harmful? - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 07 April 2014 10:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 08 April 2014 10:44:21AM *  4 points [-]

almost everyone had 30-day karma ratios lower than their total karma ratios

One factor that contributes to this, but I am not sure how large part of the effect it explains: Downvoted articles disappear after a while, while upvoted articles remain visible. Therefore recent bad articles cost karma, but old bad articles don't; while both recent and old good articles can get upvotes. It's a bit similar with comments; when they are collapsed, probably people are less likely to look at them.

Please note that 30-day karma means recent votes on recent contributions -- it does not include recent votes on old contributions. And I suspect the "recent votes on old contributions" is biased towards positive, because the old bad contributions disappear.