You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

mare-of-night comments on Be comfortable with hypocrisy - Less Wrong Discussion

32 Post author: The_Duck 08 April 2014 10:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: mare-of-night 12 April 2014 12:40:56PM 1 point [-]

Perhaps beef-only could be an alternative to fish-only as a stepping stone? I think I remember beef getting better ratings than most other things in some articles comparing utility of eating animals with the assumption that all creatures suffer equally. (Pigs are smarter than cows, I think, but I'm not sure if you were considering them mid-size or large.)

Comment author: DanielLC 12 April 2014 06:41:01PM 1 point [-]

I figure it would be more brain size than intelligence. I would expect pain would increase by having more neurons to feel it, not having a deeper understanding of what it is.

Beef-only has the opposite problem. If not all creatures suffer equally, avoiding cows would be most important.

Comment author: mare-of-night 13 April 2014 03:22:55PM 0 points [-]

Ok, this makes sense.

Also, I found the article. If those numbers are somewhat correct, maybe add an adjustment for brain mass to it? But just from rough guesses at the affect that would have, I see why going for medium-size animals makes sense.