You mean, he might have this power there's no evidence for him wielding, therefore he does have the power?

Having power and wielding it are two separate shoes. In the article he writes that he does have certain powers that he's seldomly using.

Secondly I have not argued that I'm certain that he has the power. I'm not a person who thinks in of binary categories of 0% and 100%. Don't project that into my writing.