So, to recap. Brennan says "lying to voters is the right thing when good results from it".
So, is there any insight here other than restating the standard consequentialist position that "doing X is right when it leads to good outcomes"?
Especially given how Brennan backpedals into deontological ethics once we start talking about the real world?
You know the drill - If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.