You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Squark comments on Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Tenoke 16 April 2014 07:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (190)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Squark 28 April 2014 07:15:57PM 0 points [-]

...They will eventually incur one of three costs: reprocessing, geological storage, or release.

How much does it cost to maintain the current facilities? By what factor does it make nuclear energy more expensive?

I don't understand how automation changes the energy, material, or complexity costs (think supply chains or fuel flows) associated with a technology.

The most important component of economic cost is human labor. We have plenty of energy and materials in the universe left. "complexity" is not a limited resource so I don't understand what "complexity cost" is.

Some things will turn out to not be possible...

Yes, but I think that current technology is very far from the limits of the possible.

Except that when we look out into the universe we don't see Dyson spheres, or evidence of replicators from elsewhere having passed our way, and we would be able to see Dyson spheres from quite a distance.

Sure, because we are the only intelligent life the universe. What's so surprising about that?