You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on How do you approach the problem of social discovery? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: InquilineKea 21 April 2014 09:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 23 April 2014 12:30:08AM *  3 points [-]

Are you trying to be some kind of internet bully?

LOL. Yes, and I also kick kittens into the traffic as a hobby :-P

But I'll unroll this for you. The OP made some assertions about "made me better" and "one of the very best decisions I've ever made in my life", and provided a couple of links, probably to substantiate these assertions. Unfortunately it seems to me that the content behind these links not only doesn't substantiate these claims, but actually puts into question the judgment of the OP. The quotes in the parent post are precisely what made me doubt the claims about "made me better" as well as the criteria by which the OP picks the best decisions he has made in his life.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 23 April 2014 03:33:51AM 3 points [-]

It seems to me that since Alex is an expert on his own life, we should give his opinion that good internet peers are more valuable to him than lousy real-life peers very substantial weight. But perhaps someone with a different sort of personality would derive less value from internet peers.

Comment author: Lumifer 23 April 2014 04:16:48AM 5 points [-]

Alex is an expert on his own life

The OP is an expert on the facts of his own life. One of the standard LW lessons is that people tend to suck at evaluating themselves, though.

Comment author: InquilineKea 06 May 2014 03:43:02AM *  -1 points [-]

Hm - thanks for the feedback. I've decided to edit my answers to think them out more (so that they're hopefully more convincing - though they might not be convincing yet). Of course - this is not the goal of rationality. I've just realized that some of my past rationalizations suck.

I am very well aware that people generally suck at evaluating themselves (especially given sunk costs and post hoc rationalizations). But I emphatically assign an extremely high probability to getting AoK as being one of the best decisions of my life ever (some of the other things I've bulleted though - I actually assign lower probabilities to).

Comment author: pinyaka 24 April 2014 02:29:38PM *  1 point [-]

we should give his opinion that good internet peers are more valuable to him than lousy real-life peers very substantial weight

Especially if OP has ASD. People are more tolerant of "weirdness" on the internet.