This is probably, more than anything, the main trait I've noticed in the sequences. Repetition of concepts. Every other articles acts as a collector of what's been explored before. So, it becomes important to look away from the repeated and cached ideas, to make sure that they still hold up outside of an echo chamber.
The ones that still hold start to feel suspiciously more real than competing ideas. Doesn't make them perfect maps. Just better ones.
This is the public group instrumental rationality diary for May 1-15.
Thanks to cata for starting the Group Rationality Diary posts, and to commenters for participating.
Previous diary: April 16-30
Next diary: May 16-31
Rationality diaries archive