You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ArisKatsaris comments on May 2014 Media Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: ArisKatsaris 01 May 2014 09:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (65)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 01 May 2014 09:49:49PM 0 points [-]

Fiction Books Thread

Comment author: FiftyTwo 03 May 2014 12:56:17AM 2 points [-]

"The Martian" Hard scifi

Comment author: lmm 05 May 2014 05:04:31PM 1 point [-]

Look Who's Back; I have a soft spot for Hitler comedy (I feel it's good to mock rather than be solemn and respectful) and found that side of it very amusing, but it also works as a Nathan Barley-style sendup of media/hipster culture. For a translation it read remarkably smoothly, though I suppose German-English is a smaller linguistic distance than most.

Comment author: Transfuturist 06 May 2014 04:52:18AM 0 points [-]

Is the title an Eminem reference?

Comment author: lmm 06 May 2014 01:22:01PM 0 points [-]

I don't know. I'd be surprised if it was though.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 08 May 2014 07:41:13PM 0 points [-]

I'm reading World without End, by Ken Follett. It's the sequel to his superb The Pillars of the Earth, which is a marvel, but you don't need to have read the first to savor the second.

What surprised me about World without End is the amount of characters who openly defy the mindless obedience to dogma that you'd expect in a typical Medieval town. I've only read until the 100-ish page, and there's already a clever plotting mother, an aspiring doctor, a carpenter apprentice, all willing to question conventional wisdom and try new ways to do things. It's been refreshing so far.

Comment author: Nornagest 08 May 2014 07:51:01PM *  2 points [-]

If the Canterbury Tales taught me anything, it's that medieval people could actually get pretty creative and irreverent when it came to things they cared about. It's the institutions and the background assumptions that are different. Individual people often weren't all that dogmatic, and indeed enforcement of societal norms was weaker in a lot of ways than it is now; but above the individual level, almost every organization was narrowly focused on the status quo or on zero- or negative-sum games. There was nothing forward-looking in the way that science is, or even in the way that serious utopian politics is.

(It also taught me that fart jokes are perennial. A lot of those scenes wouldn't have been out of place in South Park.)

Comment author: [deleted] 08 May 2014 09:36:11PM 0 points [-]

I'm going through The Pillars of the Earth and quite enjoying myself. I expected something a little on the romantic side with a chance of dullness now and then from Follett being unable to control his "show off my research" that affects many authors of his class (like Crichton). However, the book is entertaining, the characters far more interesting than I expected, and his presentation of medieval thought life is very sympathetic without being romantic. These people think. Some well, some poorly. It is quite good.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 08 May 2014 10:03:08PM 1 point [-]

A couple of memories from The Pillars of the Earth-- it was a surprise to me that most of the misery was caused by social disorder rather than too much authority, though it did show the rise of Catholic power to affect daily life, and it had rather a lot (interesting for me, at least) about how the Catholic church managed to exist as a large institution at such a low tech level.

Comment author: gwern 02 May 2014 12:15:24AM 0 points [-]

Fiction: