Sure, you have to "play by the rules" to be successful, but going above and beyond doesn't seem to lead to additional success.
My point is more about giving the standard amount to the standard charities, rather than earmarking it all for the most efficient one.
which does not have to causally pay of for the organism (instead, the payoff is acausal)
I'm not sure what you mean here. Can you give an example?
which does not have to causally pay of for the organism (instead, the payoff is acausal)
I'm not sure what you mean here. Can you give an example?
Suppose I have a gene that makes me cooperate in a prisoner's dilemma with my relatives. This gene benefits me, because now I can cooperate with my cousins and get the better payoff (assuming my cousins also have this gene!). But you know what would be even better? If my cousins cooperated with me but I defected. So from a causal decision theory standpoint, my best route is to ignore my instincts and defect...
Previous Open Thread
You know the drill - If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one.
3. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.
4. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.