You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Raythen comments on Open Thread, May 5 - 11, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Tenoke 05 May 2014 10:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (284)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Raythen 06 May 2014 03:38:29PM *  6 points [-]

I wonder what you think of the question of the origin of consciousness i. e. "Why do we have internal experiences att all?" and "How can any physical process result in an internal/subjective experience?"

I've read some material on the subject before, and reading the quantum physics and identity sequence got me thinking about this again.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 May 2014 04:42:09PM 5 points [-]

Douglas Hofstadter is the go to, mainstream, "hey I recognize that name" authority, though it obviously should be noted that he is a cognitive scientist, not a biologist, neurologist, or nuero-biologist. So, you couldn't build a brain from reading Godel, Escher, and Bach. The only other material I intimately know that discusses the origin of consciousness is Carl Sagan's The Dragons of Eden, which, again, is mainstream and pop science. It's fun reading and enjoyable, but you can't build a brain from it. Someone else can probably suggest better sources for more study.

Of course, some components of these questions can be answered by reducing the question to find out more about what you're looking for.
What's the make up of an internal experience? What are its moving parts? How do you build it?
How are subjective experiences not physical processes? If they aren't physical, what are they?
Taboo "internal/subjective experiences." What are you left with to solve? What mechanics remain to be understood?

Since you've read through the quantum physics sequence, I'm sure you've been exposed to these ideas already. I'm not a neuroscientist or a cognitive scientist. I know very little about the brain that wasn't used for blunt symbolism in Neon Genesis or Xenogears. But I'd guess that, whatever mechanism(s) allows for consciousness, it's built using the matter available. No tricks or slight of hand.

Comment author: Raythen 06 May 2014 08:38:40PM 1 point [-]

Thank you - this is helpful.

Comment author: Alejandro1 07 May 2014 02:36:32AM 4 points [-]

My suggestion would be to start with Dennett's Consiousness Explained. It tackles exactly the questions you are interested in, and it is much more entertaining than the average philosophy/neurology book on the topic.