You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on Open Thread, May 5 - 11, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Tenoke 05 May 2014 10:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (284)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 07 May 2014 04:46:50PM 2 points [-]

That's what acausal benefit means.

Comment author: Lumifer 07 May 2014 05:01:11PM 0 points [-]

Google: No results found for "acausal benefit"

Can you elaborate?

Comment author: DanielLC 07 May 2014 08:36:29PM 1 point [-]

It's mostly limited to this site, and I don't know how much that exact wording is used, but it refers to things like Newcomb's problem, where you can get some benefit from what you do, but you're not actually causing it.

I should add that when I told Manfred, I didn't understand, it was more that I didn't understand how it applied to that situation.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 May 2014 02:46:10PM 1 point [-]

I'm familiar with the concept of an acausal trade. But I don't understand how it applies to the situation of playing Prisoner's Dilemma with your cousins.

Comment author: Nornagest 07 May 2014 09:00:12PM 1 point [-]

The wiki article on acausal trade may prove helpful.