Open Thread, May 5 - 11, 2014

Tenoke

Previous Open Thread

You know the drill - If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

Notes for future OT posters:

1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.

2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one.

3. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.

4. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.

Previous Open Thread

You know the drill - If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

Notes for future OT posters:

1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.

2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one.

3. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.

4. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.

That's a reiteration of your original claim and in no way a reply to Nancy's question.

I thought Nancy was asking me to identify a specific article that was selectively quoted. I did: all of them.

I'm just saying that the headline is a lie, supported by selective quotation: this is not a finding of sexual similarity and none of the popular coverage claims that it is a study of sexual difference. I'm not saying anything fancy about subtle connotations that are smuggled in and not explicitly identified. This is a very simple claim and anyone interested in more detail should read the popular articles themselves. What else could I have possibly meant?

6

Open Thread, May 5 - 11, 2014

6

You know the drill - If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

6

6

Open Thread, May 5 - 11, 2014

6

You know the drill - If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

6