You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ThisSpaceAvailable comments on Arguments and relevance claims - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 05 May 2014 04:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 06 May 2014 12:31:11AM 2 points [-]

To me, "argument" means "A logical (or, at least, putatively logical) progression from premises to conclusion". "I have seen a blue Martian" is not an argument. If it is implied that you are wrong because of this, then "You are wrong because I have seen a blue Martian" would be the argument, while "I have seen a blue Martian" is a premise. So, in my nomenclature system, the issue is that many arguments/conclusions are left implicit. People often aren't even consciously aware that they are leaving the most important part of their argument unsaid. I find that often, much of responding to people consists of badgering them to make their arguments explicit, to little success.