You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

polymathwannabe comments on What do rationalists think about the afterlife? - Less Wrong Discussion

-16 Post author: adamzerner 13 May 2014 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: adamzerner 14 May 2014 12:57:27AM *  2 points [-]

I'm familiar with the current scientific literature on the neural correlates of consciousness (I was a neuroscience major and did my senior thesis on it). But these are correlates. We indeed don't know of any correlates on a level smaller than the neuronal level, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 14 May 2014 01:01:10AM 0 points [-]

Elsewhere on this thread you also said,

we don't have the data that shows that the 3 possibilities I mentioned in the post don't occur.

Are you seriously going to posit a belief in the afterlife just because neurology can't prove a negative?

Comment author: adamzerner 14 May 2014 01:04:00AM *  0 points [-]

Are you seriously going to posit a belief in the afterlife just because neurology can't prove a negative?

No, I'm just saying that it's possible, not that I believe in it.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 14 May 2014 01:09:02AM -1 points [-]

Not with quantum consciousness. That's not even in "possible" territory.