You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Furcas comments on What do rationalists think about the afterlife? - Less Wrong Discussion

-16 Post author: adamzerner 13 May 2014 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: private_messaging 14 May 2014 02:22:14PM *  3 points [-]

There's a lot of very bizarre death-related stuff some people here take seriously: future simulations of you recreated from historical data, "quantum immortality", big universe with copies of you existing very far away, us living in a simulation, and so on and so forth. It's just that the atheists who believe in such can't call that "afterlife" otherwise they wouldn't be atheists.

edit: I think there's also a very serious case of inconsistency. If you ask someone about "afterlife", they're pretty sure there's no afterlife, but if you come up with an elaborate narrative, for example one where the future AI uses all the digital data and backtracks a simulation of the world to recreate you, so when you die you just wake up in that AI's simulation - they're no longer nearly as sure.

Comment author: Furcas 15 May 2014 04:14:57AM 0 points [-]

There's no inconsistency, because we take the word 'afterlife' to mean what 99% of humanity means by it, which isn't, y'know, really compatible with the pattern theory of identity.

Comment author: private_messaging 15 May 2014 07:32:03AM 1 point [-]

"Afterlife" encompasses a very wide variety of beliefs, especially if you are speaking of 99% of humanity. That's sort of like saying "trees" is incompatible with "pines".

Comment author: Furcas 15 May 2014 02:44:36PM *  0 points [-]

No, it's like not using the word 'God' to describe a super-intelligent AI. The two concepts have some things in common, but a physical, man-made computer program just isn't what people mean when they say "God". Likewise, their brain getting reconstructed some decades after their death isn't what people mean when they say "afterlife".

Comment author: Lumifer 15 May 2014 02:52:14PM 1 point [-]

but a physical, man-made computer program just isn't what people mean when they say "God".

Yet.

X-D

Comment author: ChristianKl 29 May 2014 03:01:55PM -1 points [-]

I think God would fit in many places where people on LW say Omega.

Comment author: drethelin 17 May 2014 06:07:25AM -2 points [-]

more like saying search trees are the same thing as pine trees