You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

V_V comments on [LINK] Utilitarian self-driving cars? - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: V_V 14 May 2014 01:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: V_V 14 May 2014 09:00:06PM *  0 points [-]

In terms of liability it makes sense to try to make sure that the accident remains legally the fault of the other party no matter the number of deaths and the law rarely accepts intentionally harming one person who wasn't at fault in order to avoid an accident and spare the lives of a car with 2 people who were at fault themselves.

Makes sense. Though the design of a motion control algorithm where the inverse dynamics model interacts with a road law expect system to make decisions in a fraction of a second would be... interesting.