You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

satt comments on [LINK] Prisoner's Dilemma? Not So Much - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: torekp 20 May 2014 11:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: satt 21 May 2014 12:46:06AM 3 points [-]

The analytic result (that only 2 of 736 strategically unique ordinal 2×2 games are PDs) is interesting, the numerical simulation less so; the paper doesn't motivate the specific choice of a uniform distribution from which to randomly sample payoffs. (I can imagine the results changing quite a lot if the payoffs are taken from e.g. lognormal or normal distributions instead.)

Comment author: torekp 25 May 2014 04:07:39PM *  1 point [-]

Wanna bet? I made a few Prediction Book entries. The author was nice enough to give me his source code; I modified it and ran it. I will edit this comment as soon as I finish cranking out the results. I'll rot13 them, or hide them in a spoiler window (is that possible?), for those who'd like to try a Prediction Book probability estimate.

I neglected to make Prediction Book entries for the lognormal distribution, but they would have been similar. Herewith, the results in rot13:

Normal distribution: guerr cbvag sbhe creprag

Lognormal: guerr cbvag svir creprag

Additional edit: based on a few runs, the error of those estimates from the true mean is of the order of 0.1%.

Comment author: satt 25 May 2014 07:44:01PM *  0 points [-]

I'd put, say, 45% on continuous normal distributions giving a <3.4% PD proportion, and 55% on them giving a ≤5.1% distribution. (I don't have a PredictionBook account so I'll just note those probabilities here before I look at your answers.)

Edit: I'll rot13 everything after this sentence in case anyone else is making guesses. V jnf jebat! Gur cerpvfr qvfgevohgvba nccrnef gb znxr ab qvssrerapr, cerfhznoyl orpnhfr gur CQ'f na beqvany curabzraba, abg n pneqvany bar. (Cerfhznoyl bar pbhyq cebir guvf zngurzngvpnyyl gb obyfgre Ehfpu'f cbvag.)