His use of philosophical zombies does not dissuade me.
The idea of devices that transform input data with "low-density parity-checks" having more phi than humans concerns me slightly more. If it is a valid complaint, then I believe it's probably an issue with the formalism, not with the concept.
I need to read further.
I didn't downvote, but I'm guessing it's because you stated your opinions about the post without giving reasons for believing in those opinions.
Scott Aaronson, complexity theory researcher, disputes Tononi's theory of consciousness, that a physical system is conscious if and only if it has a high value of "integrated information". Quote:
http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1799