You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Michaelos comments on [meta] Policy for dealing with users suspected/guilty of mass-downvote harassment? - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 06 June 2014 05:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (239)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 June 2014 12:57:52PM 3 points [-]

How easy is it to change the ratio of required upvotes to allowed downvotes? As an example, I very rarely downvote, so I probably have quite a lot of spare downvotes. If you were to change the ratio to require receiving 10 upvotes per 1 downvote, I don't even think I'd notice, and I imagine that a lot of people with this type of voting pattern would be in a similar position.

On the other hand, someone who mass downvotes presumably is going to burn through their downvotes faster than even someone who downvotes fairly, but finds themselves generally more inclined to downvote overall than I would (A report from a Trike person could probably confirm or deny this.) Mass downvoters would be far more likely to bump up against a stricter ratio.

So perhaps changing the ratio would be a helpful technical solution, in addition to other policy decisions?

Comment author: David_Gerard 06 June 2014 01:39:07PM 4 points [-]

Make your downvoting ability proportional to upvotes in the past month rather than upvotes ever?