You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Kawoomba comments on [meta] Policy for dealing with users suspected/guilty of mass-downvote harassment? - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 06 June 2014 05:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (239)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kawoomba 06 June 2014 01:44:49PM *  2 points [-]

I've been actively modding /r/DebateReligion (not exactly a topic which preempts drama) over on Reddit (not exactly a community which dislikes drama) for years, and at least from my experiences there I wouldn't dream of putting such questions to the community (especially with delicious "redacted" drama bait) before coming to some sort of consensus with my fellow moderators. You could of course argue (and I'd agree) that this is a more mature community.

Also, I wouldn't cite "presumption of innocence" when apparently unaware of much more pertinent principles (no retroactively applied punishments, not even hinting at a disclosure of legitimately presumed-private data). I do agree that a specific rule going forward would be a good idea, given how often this topic crops up. To establish such a rule -- via public discussion, if you so choose --, dangling (however unwittingly) the allure of a witch-hunt would have best been left out entirely.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 June 2014 02:17:04PM *  1 point [-]

I've been actively modding /r/DebateReligion

At the moment nobody is actively modding LW so the comparison doesn't really hold. The community mostly mods itself by downvoting posts it doesn't like.