The main function of downvotes in LW is NOT to re-educate the offender. Its main function is to make the content which has been sufficiently downvoted effectively invisible.
Negative externalities.
If you eliminate the downvotes, what will replace them to prune the bad content?
Something else? The above study is sufficient evidence for me (and hopefully others) to start finding another solution.
Negative externalities.
I am aware of the concept. What exactly do you mean?
The above study is sufficient evidence for me
It says "This paper investigates how ratings on a piece of content affect its author's future behavior." I don't think LW should be in the business of re-educating its users to become good 'net citizens. I'm more interested in effective filtering of trolling, stupidity, aggression, drama, dick waving, drive-by character assassination, etc. etc.
It's not like the observation that downvoting a troll does not magically convert him into a hobbit is news.
Below is a message I just got from jackk. Some specifics have been redacted 1) so that we can discuss general policy rather than the details of this specific case 2) because presumption of innocence, just in case there happens to be an innocuous explanation to this.
So... thoughts? I have mod powers, but when I was granted them I was basically just told to use them to fight spam; there was never any discussion of any other policy, and I don't feel like I have the authority to decide on the suitable course of action without consulting the rest of the community.