Can you provide an example where this wouldn't be obvious to the moderator examining the case?
I honestly put a very low probability on the occurrence of even a single punishment due to a false positive..
I'm not going to call out specific users here.
You know, privacy concerns, a strong preference against public shaming, and all that.
Below is a message I just got from jackk. Some specifics have been redacted 1) so that we can discuss general policy rather than the details of this specific case 2) because presumption of innocence, just in case there happens to be an innocuous explanation to this.
So... thoughts? I have mod powers, but when I was granted them I was basically just told to use them to fight spam; there was never any discussion of any other policy, and I don't feel like I have the authority to decide on the suitable course of action without consulting the rest of the community.