You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on [meta] Policy for dealing with users suspected/guilty of mass-downvote harassment? - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 06 June 2014 05:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (239)

Comments (239)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 06 June 2014 05:11:38PM 2 points [-]

then punishing you for downvoting all (90%+) of their comments ... is completely justified

Can I ask for some reasoning underlying this? In particular, I'm interested in what, in general, justifies punishment and who gets to decide whom to punish for what.

Comment author: Tenoke 06 June 2014 05:55:45PM -2 points [-]

There is a discussion on this exact topic here.

Comment author: Lumifer 06 June 2014 07:15:26PM 2 points [-]

I see no discussion on what justifies punishment, I see people saying "I would punish the guy", "I would not punish the guy". And the issue on who gets to decide is mostly absent, too, there is only that faceless "we".

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit