What's your source for this?
Regarding making votes weaker and more expensive, I was thinking about that from the standpoint of 'downvoting in general is bad', and I would still bother.
One other possibility for downvoting might be the 'conversation of ninjutsu' trope: a person's downvoting power might decrease as the number of downvotes increases, so that one person can really only nuke 10-20 karma by block downvoting instead of an arbitrary amount.
What's your source for this?
Look at a random LW thread, or perhaps this one. Comments with positive karma are many, comments with negative karma are rare. (Someone could make a script to look at the latest N articles and determine the exact ratio, but I'm to lazy.)
Maybe that just means that we have a smart and civilized discussion here, so the system is working as intended -- people upvote more than downvote because they are satisfied more often than dissatisfied.
The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that the problem is that the karma syste...
Below is a message I just got from jackk. Some specifics have been redacted 1) so that we can discuss general policy rather than the details of this specific case 2) because presumption of innocence, just in case there happens to be an innocuous explanation to this.
So... thoughts? I have mod powers, but when I was granted them I was basically just told to use them to fight spam; there was never any discussion of any other policy, and I don't feel like I have the authority to decide on the suitable course of action without consulting the rest of the community.