Lumifer comments on [meta] Policy for dealing with users suspected/guilty of mass-downvote harassment? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (239)
Evidence? Aren't such filters still available in Usenet readers? My theory is that such code was just never implemented in the shiny new web.
And with collaborative filtering, everyone doesn't need to make every adjustment themselves. That's the point. You delegate ratings to others, or combinations of others.
But is plopping someone in an ignore file supposed to be so difficult? Should be easier than ever. Have a plonk button on every post to add the guy to your kill file. "Hmmm, this guy is a dick. Plonk." Couldn't be easier. Just as easy as clicking a point of karma.
What was the nature of the harassment, and how would it be prevented in the current list software?
vBulletin which is very popular has "ignore" mechanism: put a user on ignore and you don't see his posts. Yep, it's just as easy as pressing a button.
I like ignore buttons. Cleans out the crap very quickly. And provides useful feedback to people joining lists who want to talk to people. As grown up after grown up plonks you, those who might get the message do.
Most ignore functions send no information to the ignored. No one ever gets the message because no message is sent.
If I'm engaged with someone, I tend to plonk publicly, so the fellow knows I won't be responding any longer, and others get the idea as well.
But I'll silently <ignore> too.