Evidence? Aren't such filters still available in Usenet readers?
I didn't specify 'failure of Usenet readers'. I specified failure of Usenet.
And with collaborative filtering, everyone doesn't need to make every adjustment themselves
Still a serious UI burden which doesn't scale. Torture vs dust specks.
But is plopping someone in an ignore file supposed to be so difficult?
It's difficult in the way that constant strain and vigilance is so difficult. Trivial inconveniences on every post.
What was the nature of the harassment, and how would it be prevented in the current list software?
By flat-out banning the harasser.
Usenet fails, therefore killfiles suck? I still don't see evidence.
Still a serious UI burden which doesn't scale.
Collaborative filtering is about the only way to scale.
It's difficult in the way that constant strain and vigilance is so difficult.
No more strain or vigilance necessary than a click. I don't find that so taxing.
By flat-out banning the harasser.
Ok, so the current list software is no better. How is that an indictment of collaborative filtering or killfiles? Yeah, they can't solve all problems.
Below is a message I just got from jackk. Some specifics have been redacted 1) so that we can discuss general policy rather than the details of this specific case 2) because presumption of innocence, just in case there happens to be an innocuous explanation to this.
So... thoughts? I have mod powers, but when I was granted them I was basically just told to use them to fight spam; there was never any discussion of any other policy, and I don't feel like I have the authority to decide on the suitable course of action without consulting the rest of the community.