A reminder of what downvotes are for. This is what we would get more on a website without downvotes or banning; but the banning could be circumvented by creating new accounts.
This is a bit hyperbolic, no? I expect downvotes had little to do with the grandparent getting moderated.
Below is a message I just got from jackk. Some specifics have been redacted 1) so that we can discuss general policy rather than the details of this specific case 2) because presumption of innocence, just in case there happens to be an innocuous explanation to this.
So... thoughts? I have mod powers, but when I was granted them I was basically just told to use them to fight spam; there was never any discussion of any other policy, and I don't feel like I have the authority to decide on the suitable course of action without consulting the rest of the community.