You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nornagest comments on [meta] Policy for dealing with users suspected/guilty of mass-downvote harassment? - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 06 June 2014 05:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (239)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nornagest 12 June 2014 05:35:24PM *  3 points [-]

So if I'm following this correctly, you think that the neoreactionary activity on SSC is thanks to an organized effort to create the appearance of support, but not by deceptive means? That is, Scott posts something relevant to their interests, the first neoreactionary to find it tweets "hey, come back me up", and suddenly half the NRx sphere is posting in the comments under their standard noms de blog?

I'm still not convinced, but I'd find that more plausible than astroturfing by my understanding of the word. Not sure what I'd call it, though; "brigading" is close, but not quite it. And I'm not even sure where I'd draw the line; the distinction between "check out this cool thing" and "help me burn this witch" is awfully fine, especially when the cool thing is (e.g.) an anti-FAQ.

Comment author: Lumifer 12 June 2014 05:54:53PM *  1 point [-]

Not sure what I'd call it, though; "brigading" is close, but not quite it.

Swarming?

As an aside, I have doubts that the neoreactionaries are *that* interested in gaming Yvain's blog...

Comment author: [deleted] 12 June 2014 06:23:58PM 1 point [-]

They're massively interested in controlling their presence on the Internet.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 12 June 2014 07:33:48PM 0 points [-]

"Dogpiling" is the word I've seen.