= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
RobinZ comments on Come up with better Turing Tests - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (44)
Similar to your lazy suggestion, challenging the subject to a novel (probably abstract-strategy) game seems like a possibly-fruitful approach.
On a similar note: Zendo-variations. I played a bit on a webcomic forum using natural numbers as koans, for example; this would be easy to execute over a chat interface, and a good test of both recall and problem-solving.
Maybe just do some roleplaying, with the judge as the DM.
Nope; general game-playing is a well-studied area of AI; the AI's aren't great at it, but if you aren't playing them for a long time they can certainly pass as a bad human. Zendo-like "analogy-finding" has also been studied.
By only demanding very structured action types, instead of a more free-flowing, natural-language based interaction, you are handicapping yourself as a judge immensely.