You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Come up with better Turing Tests - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 10 June 2014 10:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (44)
Tags: turing_test test better_tests turing_tests turing

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 10 June 2014 05:43:46PM 1 point [-]

Random thought: Could a computer program pass for human while commenting at slatestarcodex?

Comment author: Nornagest 10 June 2014 06:20:59PM *  4 points [-]

The "nonspecific praise" approach fooled me the first time I saw it, but it gets pretty obvious after a while.

Ditto the "extract declarative statements, act incredulous" approach.

Comment author: shminux 10 June 2014 06:36:52PM 3 points [-]

Certainly a few commenters there easily pass for computers.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 10 June 2014 06:35:53PM 1 point [-]

Why not? (1) You are not required to respond to other people's comments. (2) People generally don't suspect you of being a chatbot on a blog, so they will not test you explicitly.

So the chatbot could be designed to play safe, and reply only in situations it believes it understands.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit