You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

trist comments on Questioning and Respect - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: jkaufman 10 June 2014 10:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: trist 10 June 2014 03:54:26PM 8 points [-]

In such cases I'll say, "Oh! Interesting... how does that work exactly?" It seems to work out alright, and I would guess that other methods of asking for more information without implying that their statement is false are equally effective.

Comment author: JQuinton 10 June 2014 04:14:30PM 5 points [-]

Yes, "Tell me more" is certainly more effective than saying something like "I don't think that's true". Even if you don't think it's true, following a Socractic dialog will probably be more useful at uncovering untruth without being overtly offensive.

Comment author: pianoforte611 10 June 2014 06:03:16PM 2 points [-]

Beware, Socratic dialogs can also piss people off. But yes, "tell me more" or "why do you say that?" are better than "nope".

Comment author: brazil84 12 June 2014 07:47:28AM 4 points [-]

Beware, Socratic dialogs can also piss people off.

I agree, but I suspect a lot of the time the anger is a result of cognitive dissonance which kicks in when the person starts to realize that there are holes in his position.