You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TobyBartels comments on Two kinds of population ethics, and Current-Population Utilitarianism - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: AlexMennen 17 June 2014 10:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TobyBartels 20 June 2014 10:56:49PM 0 points [-]

All right, I can buy that. Although it may be that a small compromise is possible: taking future people into consideration with a time discount large enough that radically different people won't muck things up. To be more specific (hence also more hypothetical), current people may insist on taking into account their children and grandchildren but not worry so much about what comes after. (Again, talking about what has to be explicitly included for political reasons, separate from what gets included via the actual utility functions of included people.) This is probably getting too hairsplitting to worry about any further. (^_^)