You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on [LINK] Scott Aaronson on Google, Breaking Circularity and Eigenmorality - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: shminux 19 June 2014 08:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 20 June 2014 03:34:22AM *  0 points [-]

I'm well aware of such things. My question was aimed at the phrase "the entire village" — which is a claim of unanimity. My point was that members of the village who disapproved would have a strong incentive not to express their disapproval.

Also, American lynchings (of the period you refer to) and witch-hunts are not really the same thing, socially speaking — in part because of the supernatural corruption implied by a claim of witchcraft.

Witch-hunts are an ongoing thing, by the way, in a number of parts of the world. In some cases, economic motives are pretty clear; in others, it seems pretty clearly a matter of superstitious fear that isn't really comparable to the self-evident political or sexual-political motives behind American racial lynchings.

Comment author: Lumifer 20 June 2014 03:54:59AM 1 point [-]

Recall the top-level post.

Sure there will be deviants who disapprove. They are, clearly, very bad people.

American racist lynchings and witch-scares are not really the same thing, socially speaking.

They are expressions of the morality of the majority which is good by definition, isn't it?