You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

paper-machine comments on Open thread, 23-29 June 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: David_Gerard 23 June 2014 07:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (190)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 June 2014 06:06:33PM 4 points [-]

I know of nobody who "does the math" in LaTex [sic]

Hello! Nice to meet you!

Comment author: Punoxysm 23 June 2014 07:43:41PM 2 points [-]

My questions are how (what editor) and why?

LaTeX seems an awful way to do scratch work, which is most of math.

Comment author: kalium 25 June 2014 03:04:56AM 0 points [-]

I started using LaTeX for my physics homework because I kept making algebraic mistakes (mostly sign errors) when I'd copy expressions between steps. Ended up saving me time on net.

I use vim now (with syntax highlighting plus some useful macros), but I used nano for a few years and it wasn't too bad either. I compile in the command line and have a pdf open in another window.

Comment author: lmm 24 June 2014 07:39:10PM 0 points [-]

I use Kile. Being able to commit, tag and branch in git (heck, just being able to erase a part in the middle and rewrite it without ending up with a chain of arrows across three different pieces of paper) makes things easier to be worth the (slight) writing slowdown, and most of the time I can express myself in latex - after a while it just becomes the language you think in, \int becomes the symbol for integration and so on. Very occasionally I'll write something I know is incorrect notation but close enough that I'll know what I meant, and can go back and correct it later.