You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

BenjaminFox comments on An Attempt at Logical Uncertainty - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: BenjaminFox 30 June 2014 06:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: BenjaminFox 30 June 2014 09:18:21AM 3 points [-]

I appreciate the links. I haven't read Gaifman's paper before, so I'll go ahead and read that.

Anyhow, I won't cotton to any method of assigning a logical probability that takes longer than just brute-forcing the right answer. For this particular problem I think a bottom-up approach is what you want to use.

I see the sentiment there, and that too is a valid approach. That said, after trying to use the bottom-up approach many times and failing, and after seeing others fail using bottom-up approaches, I think that if we can at least build a nonconstructive top-down theory, that would be a starting point. After all, Solomonoff Induction is completely top down, yet it's a very powerful theoretical tool.

Comment author: Manfred 30 June 2014 05:38:26PM *  2 points [-]

after seeing others fail using bottom-up approaches

<.<

\>.>

Well, care to explain what I did wrong?

Comment author: janos 30 June 2014 01:36:02PM 2 points [-]

One nonconstructive (and wildly uncomputable) approach to the problem is this one: http://www.hutter1.net/publ/problogics.pdf