You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on [moderator action] Eugine_Nier is now banned for mass downvote harassment - Less Wrong Discussion

107 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 03 July 2014 12:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (366)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 03 July 2014 07:18:56PM 3 points [-]

Yep, suboptimal in many cases but often better than nothing.

Comment author: shminux 03 July 2014 08:22:16PM *  5 points [-]

Wrong comparison. I was not proposing doing nothing. Making the culprit's name public should have been the first step.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 04 July 2014 02:05:54PM 1 point [-]

In this case, many people had already expressed strong confidence that Eugine was a major source of mass downvoting- some we're quite certain of that and said so publicly. So it doesn't look like that matters.

Comment author: VAuroch 04 July 2014 09:57:23PM -2 points [-]

It was public, several times over.

Comment author: shminux 04 July 2014 10:03:23PM 4 points [-]

The suspicion was public, sure. There was no official confirmation and no indication that Eugene is the only one.

Comment author: EGarrett 31 January 2016 12:16:29PM *  1 point [-]

He didn't just mass downvote. He purposefully attempted to remove other contributing members from the community. He also did not confess to it indicating both dishonesty and that he was aware that his actions were unacceptable. He also multi-accounted and still does and posts absolutely disgusting and logic-free racial comments and trolling (referring to black scientists to "dancing bears." You're welcome to demonstrate what's rational or constructive about that).

You don't just undo those actions, you punish the person who takes part in them in order to deter the action occurring in the future. So that there can be civil discourse going forward. This is rational and a standard part of human social requirements.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 31 January 2016 05:12:26PM 0 points [-]

He purposefully attempted to remove other contributing members from the community. He also did not confess to it

Never publicly, but I believe that (when he was posting as "Eugine Nier") a moderator did question him privately about it and he said that was his intention.

Comment author: EGarrett 01 February 2016 12:08:37AM *  0 points [-]

Yes, he confessed to it when confronted. My understanding was that there were posts about mass downvoting and people asking who was doing it and if it was happening and he never admitted it or posted in them to confirm it, whereas if he thought it was okay there was no reason for him not to.