You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

eli_sennesh comments on Separating university education from grading - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: Stefan_Schubert 03 July 2014 05:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (60)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 July 2014 08:10:59PM 3 points [-]

4) It's helpful for students to get frequent and quick feedback, especially on papers. When drafts are not graded students put far less effort into them. Your system would need to involve someone grading drafts of papers.

As a graduate student, I cannot agree more. Frequent but only semi-significant marks are the best learning tool: significant enough that everyone has an incentive to do the work, insignificant enough that the student can get some of it wrong and simply receive correction rather than failing.

The dopamine kick I get from programming and theorem-proving derive directly from the immediate feedback of something either working or not working without impacting my social status or life plans, allowing me to learn how it's working and optimize it.