You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on Just for fun: Computer game to illustrate AI takeover concepts? - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: kokotajlod 03 July 2014 07:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 04 July 2014 03:43:49PM 2 points [-]

There should also be a mechanism for unboxed AIs to try to directly affect each other's choices; if AI One tries to make Random Event A have outcome I, and Ai Two tries to make the same random event have outcome II, then there must be some way of deciding which of the two succeeds.

A couple more mechanisms to do that:

  • Random mechanisms are numbers (prices, research, attack values, production, public opionion...), and AIs can influence those with a bonus or a malus in the direction they choose; so several agents (AI or human with the right tech) trying to influence a value just add together (and may cancel each other out)
  • Alternatively, AIs get random powers, and "control the economy" is one, "control public opinion" is another, and in a given game different AIs always get non-overlapping powers (some powers can be allowed to overlap).