Kaj_Sotala comments on Open thread, 7-14 July 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (232)
I tried reading it, gave up around page 70. At first I was reading it as a self-satire B-movie thing about transhumanist stereotypes, but at some point it dawned upon me that it was apparently meant to be read in all seriousness.
The shark-jumping moment to me was the part in the novel where the President of the United States has called for a public meeting between bioconservative religious leaders and transhumanist scientists. The dialogue is stalled, until the main character, a fourth-year philosophy student, gets up and holds a speech. He says basically that state institutions that restrict research are evil, that scientific research must proceed freely and without limitations, and that furthering transhumanism is a moral obligation which will end up benefiting both national well-being and competitiveness. The "state institutions are evil" bit is mostly the only part that gets actual arguments supporting it, the rest of the points are just stated without really providing anything to back them up.
The crowd's reaction:
That's, err, not the best job that I've seen of presenting the bioconservative viewpoint in a fair or charitable light.
Later on the philosopher goes to write his thesis, an essay praising transhumanism, and is almost failed by an Evil Bioconservative Professor for writing such garbage.
Later on he meets his love interest:
Uh huh.
Later on the said love interest jumps off a cliff in order to persuade the main character of a philosophical point. Yes, really.
Thanks for taking one for the team.