You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Douglas_Knight comments on Open thread, 7-14 July 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: David_Gerard 07 July 2014 07:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (232)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 12 July 2014 09:09:49PM *  1 point [-]

Then employers would fight over the applicants that have this other feature, rather than those with the university education.

That is only true if the new signal partially screens off education. If the employers have the choice of using the joint signal, what matters is the additional value of the education signal beyond the new signal. If you found a signal completely unrelated to education, it would not reduce the value of the education signal. For example, if employers value IQ, diligence, and honesty, but only the first two contribute to education, then an honesty test would not reduce the value of education, while an IQ test would reduce the value of education to just the value of diligence.