You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ike comments on Open thread, 7-14 July 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: David_Gerard 07 July 2014 07:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (232)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ike 15 July 2014 03:26:21PM 0 points [-]

I understand that, which is why I concede that they may choose the million in one case and not in the other. But I think that their decision may be based on other factors, i.e. that they don't actually believe they'd get the million with 99% probability. They're imagining someone telling them ,"I'll give you a million if this RNG from 1-100 comes out anything but 100 (or something similar)", and are not factoring out distrust. My example with reversing the flow of money was also intended to correct for that.

Perhaps the heuristics you refer to are based on this? Has this idea of "trust" been tested for correlation with "losing money and gaining money" distinction?