= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
LimberLarry comments on This is why we can't have social science - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (82)
I don't think we actually disagree on anything, the only point I was making was that your reply to Lightwave, while accurate, wasn't actually replying to the point he made.
I did reply to his point. He spoke about nutrition science. That field has it's own problems that psychologists don't have to deal with. It's a bad example if he wanted to make the point you think he wanted to make.
Well fair enough. His use of nutrition science as an example was probably poorly chosen.