You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Pablo_Stafforini comments on Open thread, 14-20 July 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: David_Gerard 14 July 2014 11:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (144)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 20 July 2014 04:48:57PM *  0 points [-]

Yes, I considered that approach. But the vagueness involved in the notion of a "piece of junk food" was such that I found I had considerable latitude in determining how many pieces of junk food I ate on a particular day. By contrast, deciding whether I ate a certain type of junk food at all is usually quite straightforward, and not subject to rationalization. As Jon Elster wrote:

Kant’s rule of smoking only one pipe after breakfast was not unambiguous enough to give him full protection, since as time passed he bought himself bigger and bigger pipes. When feasible, the rule ‘‘Never do it’’ may be the only one that can be stably upheld.

(Of course, you may not have a problem if you are sufficiently self-disciplined, as you seem to be.)

Comment author: peter_hurford 20 July 2014 06:42:09PM 0 points [-]

(Of course, you may not be a problem if you are sufficiently self-disciplined, as you seem to be.)

Yeah, that seems right.

But the vagueness involved in the notion of a "piece of junk food" was such that I found I had considerable latitude in determining how many pieces of junk food I ate on a particular day.

I tend to define it roughly as "250 calories of something that is devoid of nutritional value and consumed primarily for taste".